Friday, 25 May 2012

It’s time to harden up on those soft skills!

My interest in gauging hard against soft stems from my Master’s dissertation where I considered India’s strength in terms of its hard and soft power. In the process I learnt the importance of the two attributes and also the need to combine the two. Today, on the verge of settling into a corporate career, I am once again comparing the hard vs. the soft. This time it’s about gauging one’s hard skills vs. soft skills.

Working with the HR Team in my current organization, I have come across many graduate recruits. The company goes to various institutes to pick the best talent. However, I often wonder, is picking the most talented students enough? No Sir! My biggest problem when faced with fresh recruits is communicating with them. My strongest point when conversing with people is my gift of gabbing. However, I have noticed, I am the only one talking. There is a sort of a communication/ language barrier between them and me. Although the language barrier is not a huge issue, it doesn’t make matters easy. Such a situation might sometimes seem intimidating to them.

There is an increasing need to understand the significance of an element known as ‘People Skills’, or more popularly known as ‘Soft Skills’. Soft skills can be defined as interpersonal skills, behavioural and abstract in nature, but essential for performing a job. These skills tend to influence how we interact with each other. It won’t be wrong in saying soft skills can enable a person to become a better employee, thus opening doors to opportunities. In simple terms, soft skills refer to a person’s ability to relate to others, to get him/ her organized, to communicate in written, spoken or other forms etc. The question often going through my mind is, ‘If soft skills are so important, why isn’t as much consideration given to it?’ Why are organisations only just realising its no longer enough to be an expert in a field of specialisation? These are some of the questions that need immediate ATTENTION (with a big bold exclamation mark). Competition is becoming increasingly fierce and it’s one’s soft skills that make them stand out.

Instead of dismissing these skills as being mere tools to hide technical incompetence, there is a need to highlight the importance of building on one’s soft skills. Yes, possessing good soft skills can help cover a gap in the technical area, however, that is not all. Developing your soft skills can bring about many positive changes.

We often don’t realise how many of our actions bring out our inherent personality. How we talk, walk, react in certain situation(s) etc. all shape our personality. Therefore, it becomes even more crucial for us to build on our soft skills, which will eventually help shape our personality. The following case underlines the importance of possessing soft skills:

Case:

A top scoring student interviews with an organization to join as a Graduate Engineer. The student’s knowledge of the technical domain is extremely competitive, which helps him impress the interviewing panel and he is immediately sent for the next level of interview- an interview with HR. The HR’s role in this process is to assess the candidate’s communication skills, level of confidence in handling questions, inter-personal relations, overall attitude etc. The candidate, already high on having cleared the gruelling technical rounds, enters the interview room. After exchanging pleasantries, begins the real test. The HR representative asks the candidate various questions related to his education background, family background, interests, hobbies etc. The candidate starts answering best to his ability. However, this is where the problem arises. All through his formal education, the candidate has been taught to concentrate on enhancing his technical knowledge, thus helping him sail through. However, what these candidates are not taught is how to tackle basic questions about self. Although the answers are simple, the candidate fails to put them across, thus forming unappealing impression on the interviewer. The result is evident.

Two important questions emerge out of this:

1. Can an organization afford to overlook one’s poor performance in terms of soft skills and still recruit the candidate, solely on the basis of the technical knowledge demonstrated?

2. Can the candidate afford to bank on his knowledge to get a job of his choice?

The answer in most cases is a simple, NO! Hard skills can get you an interview, but soft skills will allow you to get and keep the job!

An organization often has customers to face. When in front of the customer, a person, apart from possessing good knowledge about the product or service being offered, has to be able to communicate with lucidity. This is extremely critical to be able to get one’s point across. An organization displaying strong soft skills has a better chance of developing a loyal clientele. It has been observed, the effect of understanding the importance of soft skills, results in the staff showing higher level of co-operation and becoming more productive. An employee friendly company culture is developed, which in turn contributes to staff development. Going forward, people are better equipped to hone leadership skills. Apart from its product or service, an organization is recognized by its brand of employees, thus increasing the importance of possessing good people’s skills. Many organizations around the world recognize that, in order to gain a competitive advantage, they need to make sure their people know how to handle themselves at work and how to relate with their customers and peers.

Parting thought: Consider people at the top in any organization and ask yourself, “What got them to the top?” If one were to define their personal brand, it will become evident that the people at the top of the hierarchy are those who excel in their soft skills.

Remember: Good display of soft skills is half the battle won!

Wednesday, 23 May 2012

French Revolution: Part 2

The ouster of ‘Union pour un Mouvement Populaire’ at the hands of the ‘Socialist Party’ has caused quite a stir, not only in France but throughout Europe. This new development within France has many repercussions on various people and issues. However, without getting into the political, economic, social etc. implications of the electoral results, I am tempted to draw comparisons between the current situation in France and the situation way back in 1789.

“Why a blog post on this topic?” one might ask. And my simplistic answer is: being a History student, I have had many opportunities to study different aspects of the French society over the years. Additionally, having a parent who is as interested in the subject helped. There was a time (during my formal days of education) when every weekend my father and I would sit and recapitulate whatever I had learnt during the week. History, being a common subject of interest, was always given extra time. During this time, the events leading up to and the aftermath of the French Revolution were often discussed. So, when the French election results were out, the first thought that came to mind was, “Oh, this sounds so similar to what happened in France in 1789.”

The French Revolution between 1789 and 1799 saw the overthrow of the French Monarchy as a result of a radical and social upheaval throughout France. The Monarchy’s isolation and indifference towards hardships of the common man led to the fall of the Ancien Regime. The situation in France until May 6, 2012 was similar. Nikolas Sarkozy, or the ‘Bling Bling President’, as he was popularly known, was unceremoniously wiped off the menu by the Socialist candidate, François Hollande, to become the second Socialist President of modern France.

Before further discussion, it is important to list down the origins of the French Revolution, as is necessary to explore Sarkozy’s Presidency and what led to his rout.

Origins of the French Revolution:
  • Struggle for hegemony and the Empire outstripped the fiscal resources of the state
  • Conflict between the Monarchy and the nobility over the “reform” of the tax system resulted in paralysis and bankruptcy
  • Owing to the period of Enlightenment, impulse for reform intensified political conflicts and reinforced traditional aristocratic constitutionalism. New notions of good government were introduced, popular sovereignty being the most radical. Public opinion was now of significance.
  • Social antagonisms between the aristocracy and the bourgeoisie
  • Ineffective monarchy at the hands of Louis XVI
  • Economic hardship, especially the agrarian crisis of 1788-89 generated popular discontent and disorder, caused by food shortages.
Nikolas Sarkozy served as the French President from 2007 to 2012. Sarkozy was elected President at the height of the global economic meltdown of late 2000s, which gave rise to a subsequent financial crisis and debt deficit. Sarkozy served as the President of the European Union during the last few months of 2008 and as President of a member country of the G8 and G20, Sarkozy was involved in international debates and propositions to curb the global financial crisis. The crisis had severe economic and social consequences in France. This resulted in Sarkozy having to renounce the reduction of public deficit, and instead launch a stimulus plan (as part of the 2008 EU Stimulus Plan), in order to control growing social discontent. Sarkozy’s promise, during his Presidential campaign, to reach full employment and boost economic growth, remained but a mere promise. French involvement, especially Sarkozy’s interest, in the events of the ‘Arab Spring’ (late 2010) did not go down well with the French public. Sarkozy’s vibrant personal life, demanding constant media attention, didn’t make matters easy. Adding to his list of woes, when Sarkozy was defeated on May 6, 2012, he became the first French President since 1981 to not be re-elected. This is proof enough of public distrust towards his presidency.         

The last Queen of France, Mary Antoinette’s famous words, "Let them eat brioche", could just as well have been Sarkozy’s words during his term as President. It is visible Sarkozy led a very extravagant life, in spite of record unemployment throughout France. Resemblance with the monarchy’s attitude pre-1789 is uncanny. Sarkozy tried to spend France’s way out of trouble, however, this landed him in further trouble.

Although François Hollande is no Napoleon Bonaparte, all eyes are currently on him to transform the French society the way Napoleon did as a result of the French Revolution. It will be interesting to see how Hollande makes use of the opportunity to reiterate the famous motto, ‘Liberty, Equality, Fraternity’, which was highlighted during presidential campaign. Hollande too has promised to create new jobs, as many as 60,000 in schools and universities. It will be some time before a new revolution can be brought about by a non-revolutionary.   

During the events of the French Revolution, William Wordsworth penned down the following words,
Bliss was it in that dawn to be alive, 
But to be young was very Heaven”. 
 -       The Prelude, Residence in France (Concluded), 1850  
If Hollande succeeds in fulfilling all his promises and manages to bring France out of its  economic as well as social misery, 
Wordsworth’s words can gain more significance.    
I cannot help but add the picture below... 

 Picture Courtesy: http://www.thesun.co.uk