I recently had an opportunity to watch Atul Satya
Koushik’s popular play, Chakravyuh. The
production was staging their 40th show – their first in Pune. The
biggest crowd puller was Nitish Bharadwaj reviving his cult role of Lord
Krishna from the Mahabharat. Having watched B.R Chopra’s tele-series as a child
in the 1990s, I had a fair idea of the epic drama and the oft discussed
‘Chakravyuh’ episode.
When I came across an advert for the play to be staged
in Pune, I was very keen on seeing how something that was written thousands of
years ago could be relevant today. As is my habit, I did a bit of research
around this famed episode to brush up my knowledge so as to not ask silly
questions in the middle of the play. This was the first time I was watching a
full-fledged Hindi play, or as the director called it, Hindustani.
The play opens with Lord Krishna’s soliloquy where he
expresses his grief over the war wrecked earth. One gets to hear some hard
hitting dialogue here, where a disheartened Lord Krishna is questioning the
mother earth over her thirst to drink her people’s blood. Lord Krishna’s
melancholic monologue here sets the tone for the rest of the play, describing
the 18 days of the Battle of Kurukshtra, where he goes on to lament the
bloodbath and numerous losses.
The premise of the play revolves around the deadly war
scene where Abhimanyu, Arjun’s son, agreed to enter the complex multi-tier
defensive formation devised by Dronacharya. The play reveals the outcome of the
confrontation between Abhimanyu, alone, against the Kauravas.
Back
story – Dronacharya devised several military formations and these were studied
by the Pandavas and the Kauravas. During the Battle of Kurukshetra, Duryodhan
accused Dronacharya of harbouring sympathy for the Pandavas. In response, Dronacharya assured him that he
would devise a strategy to keep Arjun busy on another warfront and form a ‘Chakravyuh’
– complex web – for the rest of the Pandavas. With Arjun far away, the Kauravas
challenged the Pandavas to combat Dronacharya’s Chakravyuh. Only Lord Krishna,
Arjun, Abhimanyu and Pradnyuma possessed the ability to penetrate the
Chakravyuh. At this point, Abhimanyu, a mere 16 year old son of Arjun, offered
to enter the Chakravyuh to defeat the Kauravas. He claimed to have learnt the
war strategy while in his mother’s womb when Arjun had narrated it to her. However,
Abhimanyu’s mother, Subhadra fell asleep when Arjun narrated to her the escape
method, thus leading to Abhimanyu having never learnt how to escape the
formation. With Yudhishter at the helm, Abhimanyu convinced him to allow him to
enter the Chakravyuh. Yudhishter formulated a plan that the Pandavas would enter
the Chakravyuh after Abhimanyu and shatter it from within. However, as soon as
Abhimanyu entered, Jayadrath stopped the four Pandavas from entering the
Chakravyuh.
Director Atul Satya Koushik used an interesting drama
technique here where the entire episode and the outcome of the confrontation
are narrated through a flashback in the course of an interaction between
Yudhishter and Bhishma Pitama, with Bhisma Pitama mournful of the happenings in
his kingdom. Yudhishter, on the other hand, finds himself in a very difficult
situation where he has to deliver the message of Abhimanyu’s death to Arjun. During
this
The battle scene is noteworthy for the display of
martial skills by the performers. They brought the battle alive in front of the
audience’s eyes. The use of offstage vocal and instrumental music reinforced
the mood of the scenes. It is evident lot of thought went into making the
production visually appealing for today’s technologically savvy audience, while
at the same time sticking to era the story is set in. To highlight vital scenes
and keep the audience engaged, the director made use of smoke with lighting
effects. Yudhishter’s dilemma over allowing Abhimanyu to enter the Chakravyuh,
in Arjun and Lord Krishna’s absence, is portrayed very well in this scene.
The next scene – the play’s climax – marked the
re-entry of Lord Krishna. In this scene, the mood of the play changes from
fast-paced action to one of reflection. It depicts the sorrow of a wife who has
lost her husband and is now uncertain of her unborn child’s future; a mother
who is unsure whether to cry for her son or be proud of his heroism and a
dejected father who wants to mourn, while at the same time avenge his son’s
death. The background music in this scene will remind one of music from some Hindi
classics, where a distinctive tune was used to depict grief. At this point,
Lord Krishna appears on the scene with his characteristic iconic smile – kudos
to Nitish Bharadwaj here for transporting us back to the B R Chopra magnum opus.
He encourages Abhimanyu’s widow to have courage and discover the Purush within her and gear up to look
after her unborn offspring. Lord Krishna’s words here hold true even today. He
makes the characters as well as the audience understand every human being,
including God (referring to himself), is entrapped in a kind of Chakravyuh. We
are ourselves responsible for forming or breaking this web.
In a fit of rage, Arjun vowed to be at peace only
after killing Jayadrath the very next day by sunset, and
failing to do so, would commit suicide by self-immolation immediately. At this
point, deviating from what actually happened, Lord Krishna stops Krishna stops
Arjun from declaring his pledge, explaining him and in turn the audience how
the human race pledges something or the other all time, which eventually comes
in the way of what they want to achieve. He refers to Bhima’s vow to kill
Duryodhan, which stopped Abhimanyu from doing the deed inside the Chakravyuh,
thus leading to his own death. I am sure Lord Krishna’s concluding remarks will
be etched in the audience’s minds for a long time.
I like your presentation,Abolee.
ReplyDeleteThank you!
DeleteNice analysis Abs
ReplyDeletewell written abolee!!!nice critical appreciation!!
ReplyDeleteThank you!
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteVery engaging and appealing !!
DeleteThank you!
Delete